Model Hubungan Antar Pemangku Kepentingan dalam Koordinasi Penanganan Bencana di Kota Padang

  Author(s)
Dicky Fatrias    (Universitas Andalas - Indonesia) Orcid ID
Ringga Sri Rahayu Agustia (Universitas Andalas - Indonesia)

 ) Corresponding Author
Copyright (c) 2019 Dicky Fatrias, Ringga Sri Rahayu Agustia
  Abstract
Padang, capital of West Sumatera, is one of a disaster-prone area in Indonesia which was impacted the most by 2009 earthquake disaster. After seven years passed, The Regional disaster management agency of West Sumatra stated that the coordination between relevant government agencies in disaster management was still lacking. Associated with such issue, this research proposes to model an appropriate stakeholder’s coordination scheme based on the concept of 3PR (public, private, and people relationship). After all candidates of stakeholder are considered, a successful indicators of disaster response are identified. Using fuzzy AHP, the indicators were weighted based on their relative importance, and the traffic light system was applied to screen the weighted indicators. Finally, the role of each stakeholder was then identified and charted using the interpretive structural model (ISM). The proposed relationship model in disaster management coordination in Padang City consists of two levels. The first level consists of five stakeholders, namely Semen Padang, Insurance, Muhammadiyah, LPP TVRI, and Andalas University. The second level consists of three stakeholders, namely BPBD Kota Padang, Padang City Social Service and Padang City Health Office. Based on the above mapping, public sectors hold the biggest responsibility in the coordination of disaster management while the private sector and people as a supporter in the success of disaster management activities in the city of Padang
  Keywords
disaster management; stakeholders coordination; 3PL; fuzzy AHP; ISM
  Click to Read the Full Text
PDF
  References

[1] Badan Penanggulangan Bencana Daerah: Rencana Strategis Satuan Kerja Pernagkat Daerah Badan Penanggulangan Bencana Daerah Provinsi Sumatera Barat Tahun 2016-2021 (2015).

[2] T.M. Carter, “Role of Coordination Among Emergency Service Agencies in Community Prepardness”, NHWS Report Series, 79-09, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.

[3] D. Mileti, Disaster by Design: A Reassessment of Natural Hazards in The United States, Joseph Henry Press, Washington DC, 1999.

[4] P. G. Nabi, “Coordinating post-disaster humanitarian response: lessons from the 2005 Kashmir earthquake, India”, Jpurnal Development in Practice, Vol. 24, pp. 975-988, 2014. [online]. Available:https://www.tandfonline.com/. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614524.2014.964187.

[5] R. Prizzia, “Coordinating disaster prevention and management in Hawaii", Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, Vol. 1,5 Issue 2, pp.275-285, 2006. [online]. Available: https://www.emeraldinsight.com. https://doi.org/10.1108/09653560610659829.

[6] A. Iizuka, "The nature and characteristics of Japanese NGOs in international disaster response", Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, Vol. 27 Issue 3, pp.306-320, 2018. [online]. Available: https://www.emeraldinsight.com. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPM-12-2017-0303

[7] L. D. Nemakonde, D. V. Niekerk "A normative model for integrating organisations for disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation within SADC member states", Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, Vol. 26 Issue 3, pp.361-376, 2017. [online]. Available: https://www.emeraldinsight.com. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPM-03-2017-0066.

[8] Y. Lu, D. Xu, Q. Wang & J. Xu, “Multi-stakeholder collaboration in community post-disaster reconstruction: case study from the Longmen Shan Fault area in China”, Journal Environmental Hazards, Vol. 17, Issue 2, 2017. [online]. Available: www.tandfonline.com/loi/tenh20. https://doi.org/10.1080/17477891.2017.1351914.

[9] Fontainha, T. Cotta, A. Leiras, Bandeira, R. A. de Mello, Scavarda, L. Felipe, “Public-Private-People Relationship Stakeholder Model for Disaster and Humanitarian Opeations. University of Rio de Janeiro : Brazil (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.02.004.

[10] A. Apriyanto, “Perbandingan Kelayakan jalan Beton dan Aspal dengan metode Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) (Studi Kasus Jalan Raya Demak-Godong)”: Program Pascasarjana Universitas Diponegoro. Semarang (2006).

[11] Y. Laili, “Rancangan Model Struktural Kelembagaan untuk Peningkatan Capaian Tingkat Komponen dalam Negeri (TKDN) Industri Hulu Migas Indonesia”: Fakultas Teknik Salemba. Bandung (2014).

[12] H. Abidi, S. Leeuw, M. Klumpp, “Measuring Success In Humanitarian Supply Chain” International Journal of Business and Management Invention, Vol. 2, Issue 8, pp. 33-39. University of Applied Sciences : Jerman.

StatisticsArticle Metrics

This article has been read : 128 times
PDF file viewed/downloaded : 63 times

This article can be traced from





Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.