Integrasi Frame Work Risk and Insurance Management Society (RIMS) dalam Analisis Kematangan Implementasi Manajemen Risiko (Studi Kasus: PLTA Maninjau)

  Author(s)
Taufik Taufik    (Jurusan Teknik Industri, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Andalas, Padang - Indonesia)
Ahmad Fauzan (Jurusan Teknik Industri, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Andalas, Padang - Indonesia)

 ) Corresponding Author
Copyright (c) 2016 Taufik Taufik, Ahmad Fauzan
  Abstract
Indonesia electrical energy consumption growth that reached 9.2% per year requires every plant to always pursue consistent and sustainable improvement to be able to cope with the growth. Maninjau Hydropower is one of the assets of strategic energy resources to meet the electrical energy supply, especially for the southern Sumatera region. Risk management in Maninjau hydropower take place without any standard of measurement standards, so management and risk management actors do not have an overview and guide to improve the performance of the risk management activities. In this study, a standard measure used is to measure the level of maturity of the risk management implementation using the framework of the Risk and Insurance Management Society (RIMS) for Enterprise Risk Management (ERM). Measurements carried out for the realization of the value and the expected value of risk management implementation in Maninjau hydropower, as well as designing the evaluation chart implementation of risk management by integrating Key Risk Indicators (KRI) from the expected value. Based on the results of the measurements made, it was found that the actual implementation of risk management in Maninjau hydropower located on the third level (repeatable), while the implementation of the expectation value is found to be at the highest level (leadership), and the percentage achieving overall expectation value has reached 62%. The draft also raises the risk evaluation chart 15 Key Risk Indicators to be achieved by Maninjau hydropower to achieve the expected value at the leadership level.

Keywords: Risk Management, RIMS for ERM, KRI
  Click to Read the Full Text
PDF
  References

Azwar, Saifuddin. 2002, Reliabilitas dan Validitas. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar

Beasley, Mark S. et al. (2010). Developing Key Risk Indicators to Strengthen Enterprise Risk Management. USA: NC State Univesity

Crickette, Grace. et al. (2011). An Overview of Widely Used Risk Management Standards and Guidelines. Risk and Insurance Management Society Inc.

Darmawi, H. (2006). Manajemen Risiko. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara

Djohanputro, Bramantyo. (2008). Manajemen Risiko Korporat. Jakarta: PPM

Djojosoedarso, Soeisno. (2000). Prinsip-prinsip Manajemen Resiko dan Asuransi. Jakarta: Salemba 4

Fahmi, I. (2010). Manajemen Risiko (Teori, Kasus,dan Solusi) Edisi I. Bandung: Alfabeta

Gilbert, Jiil Barson. (2007). Enterprise Risk Management: The New Imperative. Houston: Lexicon System, LLC

Kementerian Energi dan Sumber Daya Mineral. (2010). Indonesian Energy Outlook 2010. Jakarta: Pusat Data dan Informasi Energi dan Sumber Daya Mineral KESDM

IMA. (2007). Enterprise Risk Management Tools and Techniques for Effective Implementation. Montvale: Institute of Management Accountants

Nazir, Moh. (2003). Metode Penelitian. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia

Provitivit Cons. (2006). Guide to Enterprise Risk Management. Protiviti Inc.

RIMS Org. (2006). RIMS Risk Maturity Model (RMM) for Enterprise Risk Management. Risk and Insurance Management Society Inc.

Roux, Mc Le. et al. (2010). Operational Risk Management in The Short-Term Insurance Industry and Risk Based Capital. Laporan Penelitian Graduate School of Business Leadership. South Africa: Univeristy of South Africa

Sugiyono. (2004). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan, Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Penerbit Alfabeta

StatisticsArticle Metrics

This article has been read : 444 times
PDF file viewed/downloaded : 139 times

This article can be traced from





Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.