Penilaian Kinerja Karyawan dengan Metode AHP dan Rating Scale

Rizka Shoumil Ilhami (Pancasila University)
Dino Rimantho (Pancasila University) Orcid ID Google Scholar or Scopus ID
PT. X organizes the office promotion every year, however it has not implemented the performance appraisal concept. This study was conducted on junior analyst at Laboratory Department of Routine Test in PT.X which has the highest number of employees in PT. X. This research aimed to find out the performance appraisal criteria and sub criteria of the junior analysts, provide the weighting for each criteria and sub criteria using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method, and recommend the planning framework of performance appraisal for junior analyst using Rating-Scale method in order to conduct the office promotion. The main criteria derived from this research were attendance, working target attainment, work thoroughness, proactive, empathy, cooperation (team/organization), analytical thinking, and flexibility. The result showed the working target attainment as the most important of the criterion approximately 0.248. Moreover, the consistency ratio around 0.020. In addition, the result of this research is applicable and could be proposed for conducting performance appraisal of junior analysts at Laboratory Department of PT.X in order to perform the office promotion.
appraisal; performance; promotion; AHP; rating-scale
  Click to Read the Full Text

[1] Wirawan. Evaluasi Kinerja Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Salemba Empat, 2009.

[2] L.P. Sinambela. Kinerja Pegawai. Jakarta: Graha Ilmu, 2012.

[3] G. Dessler. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Edisi Kesepuluh Jilid 2. Jakarta: Index, 2010.

[4] M. Manullang. Manajemen Personalia. Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press, 2015.

[5] T.L. Saaty dan L.G. Vargas. Models, Methods,Concepts and Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (Second Edition). New York: Springer, 2012.

[6] E. Nurmianto dan N. Siswanto. “Perancangan Penilaian Kinerja Karyawan berdasarkan Kompetensi Spencer dengan Metode AHP.” Jurnal Teknik Industri, Vol. 8(1), pp. 40-53, 2006.

[7] D. Rimantho, B. Cahyadi, D. Dermawan. “Application analytic hierarchy process (AHP) by utilizing the Expert Choice as a tool in decision-making: a case study of e-waste management in Surabaya, Indonesia.” In Conference Proceedings 8th International Seminar on Industrial Engineering and Management, Malang, Jawa Timur, 2015.

[8] D. Rimantho, M. Rachel, B. Cahyadi, Y. Kurniawan. “Aplikasi Analytical Hierarchy Process Pada Pemilihan Metode Analisis Zat Organik Dalam Air.” Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Industri, Vol. 15(1), pp. 47–56, 2016,

[9] D. Rimantho, B. Cahyadi. “Six Sigma Method Approach in the Prevention of Occupational Accidents on the Solid Waste Collector in South Jakarta.” ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Vol. 11(16), pp. 10014-22, 2016.

[10] D. Rimantho, T.A. Rahman, B. Cahyadi. “Application of six sigma and AHP in analysis of variable lead time calibration process instrumentation.” In AIP Conference Proceedings, Vol. 1813(1), 040004, 2017,

[11] T. Semih dan S. Seyhan. “A multi-criteria factor evaluation model for gas station site selection.” Journal of Global Management. Vol. 2(1), pp. 12-21, 2011.

[12] CIFOR (Centre for International Forestry Research). Guidelines for Applying Multi-Criteria Analysis to the assessment of Criteria and Indicators. CIFOR: Jakarta, Indonesia, 1999.

[13] Werther, B. William, dan K. Davis. Human Resources and Personnel Management. Fifth Edition. USA: Mc Graw Hill, 1996.

[14] R.Y. Efranto, L. Riawati, dan R.S. Dinaputri. “Perancangan Penilaian Kinerja Karyawan Pada Perusahaan Furniture Dengan Metode 360 Degrees Feedback.” Journal of Engineering and Management in Industrial System, Vol. 3(2), pp. 111-119, 2015.

[15] A. Aggrawal dan G.S.M. Thakur. “Techniques of Performance Appraisal - A Review.” International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology (IJEAT), Vol. 2(3), pp. 617-621, 2013.

StatisticsArticle Metrics

This article has been read : 33 times
PDF file viewed/downloaded : 24 times