Perancangan Model Pengukuran Kinerja Rantai Pasok Berbasis Lean dan Green menggunakan Balance Scorecard di PT. P&P Lembah Karet

Main Article Content

Alizar Hasan
Berry Yuliandra
Eureka Perdana Putra

Keywords

Pengukuran kinerja, sistem rantai pasok, lean, green, balanced scorecard

Abstract

Rapid technological developments helped bring an increase in the level of business competition. Competitive business strategies required to address the challenges of business competition. PT P&P Lembah Karet is a company engaged in the plantation and crumb rubber processing industry. Marketing area is scattered inside and outside the country led to the supply chain performance become one of the important issues in the company. The use of Lean and Green concept in the supply chain system can become a competitive advantage for PT. P&P Lembah Karet to create a more effective and efficient supply chain strategy in terms of expenditure and environmental impact. Performance measurement is required to determine the effectiveness and efficiency of these two concepts implementation in the supply chain companies.

Performance measurement system was developed based on four perspectives of the Balanced Scorecard (BSC): financial, customer, internal business processes, learning and growth. Key Performance Indicator (KPI) which is used as a measurement basis is formulated through the concept of lean and green. The weight value of each KPI is determined using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) with relevant experts as respondents. Respondents selected based on the experience and knowledge, especially experience and knowledge that relevant with the topic of this research. The weight value determined the order of KPI priority. Face validity is used to validate the performance measurement model.

Data processing and analysis yielded 25 lean and green-based KPIs that are relevant to crumb rubber supply chain at PT. P&P Lembah Karet with 3 KPI for financial perspective, 4 KPI for customer perspective, 11 KPI for internal business process perspective and 7 KPI for learning and growth perspective. The structure of designed models showed that customer perspective is the most priority aspects.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New York: The Free Press.

[2] Chopra, S. dan Peter, M. (2007). Supply Chain Management, Strategy Planning & Operation, 3rd Edition. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.

[3] Pujawan, I. N. (2005). Supply Chain Management, Surabaya: Gundawidya.

[4] Duarte, S., Cabrita, R. dan Machado, V. C. (2011). Exploring Lean and Green Supply Chain Performance Using Balanced Scorecard Perspective. Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, 22-24 Januari, Kuala Lumpur, pp. 520-525.

[5] Putri, R. M. (2010). Integrasi Balance Scorecard dan SCOR Dalam Penilaian Kinerja Rantai Pasok pada Produk Soft Drink. Tugas Akhir. Universitas Andalas, Indonesia.

[6] Dev. N. K., Shankar, R., Dey, P. K. (2014). Reconfiguration of Supply Chain Network: An ISM-based Roadmap to Performance. Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 386-411.

[7] Routroy, S. and Pradhan, S. K. (2014). Benchmarking Model of Supplier Development for An Indian Gear Manufacturing Company. Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 253-275.

[8] Simon, A. T., Satolo, E. G., Scheidl, H. A. dan Di Serio, L. C. (2014). Business Process In Supply Chain Integration In Sugar and Ethanol Industry. Business Process Management Journal, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 272-289.

[9] Gold, S. (2014). Supply Chain Management as Lakatosian Research Program. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 1-9.

[10] Gaspersz, V. (2007). Lean Six Sigma, Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

[11] Machado, V. C. dan Duarte, S. (2010). Trade offs Among Paradigms in Supply Chain Management. Proceeding of the 2010 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, 9-10 Januari, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

[12] Lo, S. M. (2014). Effects of supply chain position on the motivation and practices of firms going green. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 93-114.

[13] Sahu, N. K., Datta, S. dan Mahapatra, S. S. (2014). Green Supplier Appraisement In Fuzzy Environment. Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 412-429.

[14] Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J. dan Lai, K. (2008). Confirmation of a Measurement Model for Green Supply Chain Management Practices Implementation. International Journal Production Economics, Vol. 111, No. 2, pp. 261-273.

[15] Mudgal, R. K., Shankar, R., Talib, P. dan Raj, T. (2009). Greening the Supply Chain Practices: An Indian Perspective of Enablers`Relationship. International Journal Advanced Operations Management, Vol. 1, No. 2/3, pp. 151-176.

[16] De Giovanni, P. dan Vinzi, V. E. (2014). The Benefits of the Emissions Trading Mechanism for Italian Firms: A Multi-Group Analysis. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, Vol. 44, No. 4, pp. 305-324.

[17] Acquaye, A., Genovese, A., Barrett, J. dan Lenny Koh, S. C. (2014). Benchmarking Carbon Emissions Performance In Supply Chains. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 306-321.

[18] Tunggal, A. W. (2011). Pokok-Pokok Performance Measurement dan Balanced Scorecard, Jakarta: Harvindo.